UPC CFI 636/2025 – Applicant v Defendant
- Court
- Local Division Mannheim
- Date
- Outcome
- Procedural Order issued concerning application for preserving evidence
- Sector
- Other
- Decision Type
- Procedural Order
Expert Commentary
Full Decision Text
1 Local Division Mannheim UPC CFI 636/2025 Procedural Order of the Court of First Instance of the Unified Patent Court issued on 3 June 2025 Applicant […] represented by: […] electronic address for service: […] Defendant […] PATENT AT ISSUE: […] PANEL/DIVISION: Local Division in Mannheim DECIDING JUDGE: Prof. Dr. Peter Tochtermann acting as presiding judge and judge-rapporteur LANGUAGE OF PROCEEDINGS: English SUBJECT OF THE PROCEEDINGS: Application for Preserving evidence (Saisie) SUMMARY OF FACTS: The applicant – as registered and sole proprietor of the Patent-in-Suit – requests under Art. 60 UPCA, R. 192 RoP to secure and preserve evidence (Saisie) based on the allegation that infringement of EP […] were highly probable. The asserted claim combination contains the following features: […] 2 The requests aim at an independent expert monitoring and examining at the premises of the defendant real-time operation of a full setup of the alleged Form of Infringement […], For further details reference is made to the application and its Exhibits. REQUESTS OF THE APPLICANT The applicant requests: […] GROUNDS FOR THE ORDER: […] ORDER: […] Issued in Mannheim on 3 June 2025 NAME AND SIGNATURE Prof. Dr. Peter Tochtermann Acting as judge-rapporteur
Key Holdings
- The court issued a procedural order concerning an application for preserving evidence (Saisie).
- The application was filed by the applicant, proprietor of the Patent-in-Suit, alleging highly probable infringement of EP [...].
- The applicant requested independent expert monitoring and examination of the alleged infringement at the defendant's premises.
- The legal basis for the application is Art. 60 UPCA and R. 192 RoP.
Tags
- Evidence
- Interim Measures
- Seizure
- UPC