Article 10 – Alternative Methods of Service
Section: Chapter I - Judicial Documents
Category: Alternative Service
Content
Provided the State of destination does not object, the present Convention shall not interfere with – a) the freedom to send judicial documents, by postal channels, directly to persons abroad, b) the freedom of judicial officers, officials or other competent persons of the State of origin to effect service of judicial documents directly through the judicial officers, officials or other competent persons of the State of destination, c) the freedom of any person interested in a judicial proceeding to effect service of judicial documents directly through the judicial officers, officials or other competent persons of the State of destination.
Related Topics
- Postal Channels
- Direct Service
- Competent Persons
- Judicial Officers
Related Cases
- UPC_CFI_187/2024, UPC_CFI_507/2024 – Advanced Cell Diagnostics v Molecular Instruments
- UPC_CFI_478/2025 – Avient v Xingi
- UPC_CFI_52/2023 – Avago v Tesla (re Fuchs)
- UPC CFI 628/2025 – Bodycap, National Center for Scientific Research - CNRS, University of Rennes v EPO
- UPC_CFI_240/2023 – Himson Engineering Private Limited v Oerlikon Textiles GmbH & Co KG