Rule 118 – Decision on the merits
Content
1. In addition to the orders and measures and without prejudice to the discretion of the Court referred to
in Articles 63, 64, 67 and 80 of the Agreement the Court may, if requested, order the payment of
damages or compensation according to Articles 68 and 32(1)(f) of the Agreement. The amount of the
damages or the compensation may be stated in the order or determined in separate proceedings
[Rules 125-144].
2. If, while there are infringement proceedings before a local or regional division, a revocation action is
pending between the same parties before the central division or an opposition is pending before the
European Patent Office, the local or regional division:
(a) may render its decision on the merits of the infringement claim, including its orders, under the
condition subsequent pursuant to Article 56(1) of the Agreement that the patent is not held to be wholly
or partially invalid by the final decision in the revocation proceedings or a final decision of the European
Patent Office or under any other term or condition; or
(b) may stay the infringement proceedings pending a decision in the revocation procedure or a decision
of the European Patent Office and shall stay the infringement proceedings if it is of the view that there
is a high likelihood that the relevant claims of the patent will be held to be invalid on any ground by the
final decision in the revocation proceedings or of the European Patent Office where such decision of the
European Patent Office may be expected to be given rapidly.
3. Where, in the decision on the merits of a revocation action, the patent is found to be entirely or
partially invalid, the Court shall revoke the patent entirely or partially according to Article 65 of the
Agreement.
4. Where the Court has made orders in accordance with paragraph 2(a) any party may apply to the local
or regional division within two months following a final decision of the central division or the Court of
Appeal or the European Patent Office as the case may be on the validity of the patent for orders
consequential on such final decision [Rule 354.2].
5. The Court shall decide in principle on the obligation to bear legal costs in accordance with Article 69
of the Agreement. The Court may order in advance of the decision that the parties submit a preliminary
estimate of the legal costs that they will seek to recover.
6. The Court shall give the decision on the merits as soon as possible after the closure of the oral hearing.
The Court shall endeavour to issue the decision on the merits in writing within six weeks of the oral
hearing. The Court shall give reasons for its decision.
7. The Court may give its decision immediately after the closure of the oral hearing and provide its
reasons on a subsequent date.
8. The orders of the Court referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2(a) shall be enforceable on the defendant
only after the claimant has notified the Court which part of the orders he intends to enforce, a certified
translation of the orders in accordance with Rule 7.2, where applicable, into the official language of a
Contracting Member State in which the enforcement shall take place has been provided by the claimant
and the said notice and, where applicable, a certified translation of the orders have been served on the
defendant by the Registry. The Court may subject any order or measure to a security to be given by the
successful party to the unsuccessful party as determined by the Court in accordance with Rule 352.
Relation with Agreement: Article 77
Related Cases
- UPC_CoA_699/2025 – Kodak v FUJIFILM
- UPC_CFI_757/2024 – Ericsson v Asustek
- UPC_CoA_28/2026 – Kodak v Fujifilm
- UPC_CoA_312/2025; UPC_CoA_333/2025; UPC_CoA_880/2025; UPC_CoA_882/2025 – Kodak v FUJIFILM
- UPC_CFI_501/2023 – Edwards v Meril
- UPC_CoA_511/2024 – Meril v Edwards
- UPC_CoA_897/2025 – Blacksheep v HL Display
- UPC_CFI_191/2025 – Genevant v Moderna