Rule 208 – Examination as to formal requirements, recording in the register, assignment to panel,
Content
designation of judge-rapporteur, single judge
1. The Application for provisional measures shall be examined by the Registry in accordance with Rule
16. The Registry shall in addition examine whether any Protective letter relevant for the Application is
recorded in the register.
2. Where main proceedings on the merits of the case have not yet been started before the Court, Rule 17
(date of receipt, recording in the register, action number, assignment to panel) and Rule 18 (designation
of judge-rapporteur by presiding judge) shall apply mutatis mutandis. In urgent cases, the presiding
judge may decide that he or an experienced judge of the panel, acting as single judge, may decide on the
Application in accordance with Rules 209 to 213 with a reduced time-table.
3. Where main proceedings on the merits of the case have already been started before the Court, the
Application for provisional measures shall immediately be forwarded to the panel to which the action
has been assigned or to the single judge. In urgent cases (where the action has not been assigned to a
single judge), the presiding judge may decide that he or the judge-rapporteur, acting as single judge,
may decide on the Application in accordance with Rules 209 to 213 with a reduced time-table.
4. The single judge deciding on the Application for provisional measures shall have all necessary powers
of the Court.
Relation with Statute: Article 19
Related Cases
- UPC_CFI_1589/2025 – Komax v Jiangsu
- UPC CoA 335/2023 – 10x Genomics, Inc. and President and Fellows of Harvard College v NanoString Technologies Inc, NanoString Technologies Germany GmbH and NanoString Technologies Netherlands B.V.
- UPC CFI NO. 649/2024, Act. No. 59315/2024, Order No. 59754/2024 – PIRELLI TYRE S.P.A. v SICHUAN YUANXING RUBBER CO. LTD. and CHINA COUNCIL FOR THE PROMOTION OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE, AUTOMOTIVE SUB COUNCIL
- UPC CFI 650/2024 – Pirelli Tyre S.P.A. v Tianjin Kingtyre Group Co., Ltd. and Kingtyre Deutschland Gmbh.
- UPC CFI 643/2024 (ORD 59913/2024, ACT 59213/2024) – CARDO SYSTEMS, Ltd. v SHENZHEN ASMAX INFINITE TECHNOLOGY Co. Ltd. and HONG KONG YIHENG INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY Co. Limited
- UPC_CFI_17/2023 – 10x Genomics, Inc. and President and Fellows of Harvard College v NanoString Technologies Inc. et al.
- UPC CFI 17/2023 – 10x Genomics, Inc. and President and Fellows of Harvard College v NanoString Technologies Inc, NanoString Technologies Germany GmbH, NanoString Technologies Netherlands B.V., Brad Gray, Mark James Daniel, and Björn Kristian Johnson
- UPC CFI 2/2023 – 10x Genomics, Inc. and President and Fellows of Harvard College v NanoString Technologies Inc., NanoString Technologies Germany GmbH and NanoString Technologies Netherlands B.V.