Rule 32 – Lodging of the Defence to the Application to amend the patent, the Reply to the Defence
Content
and the Rejoinder to the Reply
1. Within two months of service of an Application to amend the patent, the defendant shall lodge a
Defence to the Application to amend the patent setting out whether he opposes the Application to amend
the patent and, if so, why:
(a) the proposed amendments are not allowable; and
(b) the patent cannot be maintained as requested.
2. Where appropriate in view of the proposed amendments, the Defence to the Application to amend the
patent may contain submissions in accordance with Rule 44(d) to (h) and alternative non-infringement
submissions.
3. The proprietor may lodge a Reply to the Defence to the Application to amend the patent within one
month of service of the Defence and the defendant may within one month of the service of the Reply
lodge a Rejoinder to the Reply. The Rejoinder shall be limited to the matters raised in the Reply.
Related Cases
- UPC_CFI_135/2024; UPC_CFI_477/2024 – Dolby v Beko
- UPC_CFI_521/2024 – Decathlon v Lidl
- UPC_CFI_173/2024; 424/2024 – Nera v Xiaomi
- UPC_CFI_115/2024; 377/2024 – Hartman v Omni-Pac
- UPC_CFI_315/2023 – NJOY vs Juul Labs
- UPC CFI 173/2024 and 424/2024 – Nera Innovations Ltd. v Xiaomi Communications Co, Ltd. et al.
- UPC CFI 314/2023 (ACT 571795/2023) – NJOY Netherlands B.V. v Juul Labs International, Inc.
- ACT 571745/2023 UPC CFI 311/2023 – NJOY Netherlands B.V. v VMR Products LLC