Rule 361 – Action manifestly bound to fail
Content
Where it is clear that the Court has no jurisdiction to take cognisance of an action or of certain of the
claims therein or where the action or defence is, in whole or in part, manifestly inadmissible or
manifestly lacking any foundation in law, the Court may, after giving the parties an opportunity to be
heard, give a decision by way of order.
Related Cases
- UPC_CFI_79/2025_July29 – Malikie v Discord
- UPC_CoA_91/2026 – Ericsson v Transsion
- UPC_CoA_570/2024, ORD_55908/2024 – Microsoft vs Suinno
- UPC_ CFI_629/2025; UPC_ CFI_1357/2026 – Labs v GC Aesthetics
- UPC_CFI_2296/2025 – Reel v Fives
- UPC_CFI_164/2025 – Suinno v Microsoft
- UPC_CFI_238/2024 – Photon Wave v Seoul Viosys
- App 100/2024, UPC CoA 4/2024 – Meril GmbH and Meril Life Sciences Pvt Ltd. v Edwards Lifesciences Corporation