Art. 68 – Award of damages
Section: PART III
Category: CHAPTER IV - Powers of the Court
Content
1. The Court shall, at the request of the injured party, order the infringer who knowingly, or with reasonable grounds to know, engaged in a patent infringing activity, to pay the injured party damages appropriate to the harm actually suffered by that party as a result of the infringement.
2. The injured party shall, to the extent possible, be placed in the position it would have been in if no infringement had taken place. The infringer shall not benefit from the infringement. However, damages shall not be punitive.
3. When the Court sets the damages:
(a) it shall take into account all appropriate aspects, such as the negative economic consequences, including lost profits, which the injured party has suffered, any unfair profits made by the infringer and, in appropriate cases, elements other than economic factors, such as the moral prejudice caused to the injured party by the infringement; or
(b) as an alternative to point (a), it may, in appropriate cases, set the damages as a lump sum on the basis of elements such as at least the amount of the royalties or fees which would have been due if the infringer had requested authorisation to use the patent in question.
4. Where the infringer did not knowingly, or with reasonable grounds to know, engage in the infringing activity, the Court may order the recovery of profits or the payment of compensation.
Related Topics
- damages
- infringement
- lost profits
- lump sum
- punitive damages
Related Cases
- UPC_CFI_145/2024; 146/2024; 147/2024; 148/2024 – Sanofi v Accord
- UPC CoA 335/2023 – 10x Genomics, Inc. and President and Fellows of Harvard College v NanoString Technologies Inc, NanoString Technologies Germany GmbH and NanoString Technologies Netherlands B.V.
- 802/2024 – Morello Forni Italia S.R.L. and Morello Forni S.A.S. di Morello Marco & C. v. Gastroteam Abbe AB and Salvatore Marciuliano
- UPC CFI 499/2024 – Amycel LLC v - PL
- UPC CFI 318/2025 – igus GmbH v Whale Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
- UPC CFI 597/2024 – EOFLOW Co., Ltd. v INSULET CORPORATION
- UPC CFI 162/2024 – Hurom Co., Ltd. v NUC Electronics Co., Ltd
- UPC CFI 355/2023 – FUJIFILM Corporation v Kodak GmbH, Kodak Graphic Communications GmbH and Kodak Holding GmbH