Rule 152 – Compensation for representation costs
Content
1. The applicant shall be entitled to recover reasonable and proportionate costs for representation.
2. The Administrative Committee shall adopt a scale of ceilings for recoverable costs by reference to
the value of the proceedings. The scale may be adjusted from time to time.
3. Where a claim, counterclaim, application, request or appeal subject to only a fixed fee is made, the
party concerned shall, in the first submission, assess its respective value for the purpose of calculating
the applicable ceiling. The other party shall be heard. Rule 370.6 shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Related Cases
- UPC CoA 464/2024, UPC CoA 530/2024, UPC CoA 21/2025, UPC CoA 457/2024, UPC CoA 532/2024, UPC CoA 27/2025, UPC CoA 458/2024, UPC CoA 533/2024 – Edwards Lifesciences Corporation v Meril
- APL 45049/2024,UPC CoA 464/2024,APL 51701/2024,UPC CoA 530/2024,APL 1926/2025,UPC CoA 21/2025,APL 44701/2024,UPC CoA 457/2024,APL 51746/2024,UPC CoA 532/2024,APL 2205/2025,UPC CoA 27/2025,APL 44702/2024,UPC CoA 458/2024,APL 51748/2024,UPC CoA 533/2024 – Meril v Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
- APL 45049/2024, APL 51701/2024, APL 1926/2025, APL 44701/2024, APL 51746/2024, APL 2205/2025, APL 44702/2024, APL 51748/2024 – Meril v Edwards
- UPC CoA 328/2024 – Ballinno B.V. v Kinexon Sports & Media GmbH, Union des Associations Européennes de Football (UEFA), Kinexon GmbH
- UPC CoA 298/2024, APL 32345/2024, UPC CoA 299/2024, APL 32347/2024, UPC CoA 300/2024, APL 32350/2024 – Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd. and OROPE Germany GmbH v Panasonic Holdings Corporation
- UPC CoA 298/2024 – Panasonic Holdings Corporation v Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd. and OROPE Germany GmbH
- UPC CoA 101/2024 – 10x Genomics, Inc. v Curio Bioscience Inc.
- UPC CFI 415/2025 – CooperSurgical, Inc. v European Distribution Center Motiva BVBA, Establishment Labs S.A., PulseLavage AB