Article 54 – Adaptation of Measures
Section: Chapter III - Recognition and Enforcement - Section 4 Common Provisions
Category: Common Provisions
Content
1. If a judgment contains a measure or an order which is not known in the law of the Member State addressed, that measure or order shall, to the extent possible, be adapted to a measure or an order known in the law of that Member State which has equivalent effects attached to it and which pursues similar aims and interests.
Such adaptation shall not result in effects going beyond those provided for in the law of the Member State of origin.
2. Any party may challenge the adaptation of the measure or order before a court.
3. If necessary, the party invoking the judgment or seeking its enforcement may be required to provide a translation or a transliteration of the judgment.
Related Topics
- Adaptation
- Unknown Measure
- Equivalent Effects
Related Cases
- UPC_CFI_613/2024 – Pari v Philips
- UPC_ CFI_685/2024;UPC_ CFI_157/2025 – Teleflex v Speedcare
- UPC_CoA_464/2024, UPC_CoA_457/2024, UPC_CoA_458/2024, UPC_CoA_530/2024, UPC_CoA_532/2024, UPC_CoA_533/2024, UPC_CoA_21/2025, UPC_CoA_27/2025 – Meril v Edwards
- UPC_CFI_173/2024; UPC_CFI_424/2024 – Nera v Xiaomi
- UPC_CFI_239/2024_July28 – X v Essetre
- UPC_CoA_71/2025 – VMR v NJOY
- UPC CoA 464/2024, UPC CoA 530/2024, UPC CoA 21/2025, UPC CoA 457/2024, UPC CoA 532/2024, UPC CoA 27/2025, UPC CoA 458/2024, UPC CoA 533/2024 – Edwards Lifesciences Corporation v Meril
- APL 45049/2024, APL 51701/2024, APL 1926/2025, APL 44701/2024, APL 51746/2024, APL 2205/2025, APL 44702/2024, APL 51748/2024 – Meril v Edwards